Sunday, July 4, 2010

ANTI-HAZING LAW

ANTI-HAZING LAW
(R.A. NO. 8049)
Preventing Hazing: How Parents, Teachers, and Coaches Can Stop the Violence, Harassment, and Humiliation

AN ACT REGULATING HAZING AND OTHER FORMS OF INITIATION RITES IN FRATERNITIES, SORORITIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND PROVIDING PENALTIES THEREFOR.

Hazing-and initiation rite or practice as a prerequisite for admission into membership in a fraternity, sorority or organization by placing the recruit, neophyte or humiliating situations such as forcing him to do menial, silly, foolish and similar tasks or activities or otherwise subjecting him to physical or psychological suffering or injury

Prohibitions:

SEC. 2. No hazing or initiation rites in any form or manner by fraternity, sorority or organization shall be allowed without prior written notice to the school authorities or head of organization seven (7) days before the conduct of such initiation. The written notice shall indicate the period of the initiation activities which shall not exceed three (3) days, shall include the names of those to be subjected to such activities, and shall further contain an undertaking that no physical violence be employed by anybody during such initiation rites.

SEC. 3. The head of the school or organization or their representatives must assign at least two representatives of the school or organization, as the case may be, to be present during the initiation. It is the duty of such representatives to see to it that no physical harm of any kind be inflicted upon a recruit, neophyte or applicant.

SEC. 4. If the person subjected to hazing or other forms of initiation rites suffer any physical injury or dies as a result thereof, the officers and members of the fraternity, sorority or organization who actually participated in the hazing shall suffer:

a) The penalty of reclusion perpetua if death, rape, sodomy or mutilation results therefrom.
b) The penalty of reclusion temporal in its maximum period if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall become insane, imbecile, impotent or blind.
c) The penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium period if in consequence of the hazing victim shall have lost the use of speech or the power to hear or to smell, or shall have lost an eye, a hand, a foot, an arm or a leg or shall have lost the use of any such member shall become incapacitated for the activity or work in which he was habitually engaged.
d) The penalty of reclusion temporal in its minimum period if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall become deformed of shall have lost any other part of his body, or shall have lost use thereof, or shall have been ill or incapacitated of the performance of the activity or work in which he was habitually engaged for a period of more than ninety (90) days.
e) The penalty of prision mayor in its maximum period if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall have been ill or incapacitated for the performance on the activity or work in which he was habitually engaged for more than thirty (30) days.
f) The penalty of prision mayor in its medium period if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall have been ill or incapacitated for the performance of the activity or work in which he was habitually engaged for more than ten (10) days or more, or that the injury sustained shall require medical attendance for the same period.
g) The penalty of prision mayor in its minimum period if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall have been ill or incapacitated for the performance of the activity work in which he was habitually engaged from one (1) to nine (9) days, or that the injury sustained shall required medical attendance for the same period.
h) The penalty of prision correccional in its maximum period if in consequence of the hazing the victim sustained physical injuries which do not work nor require medical attendance.

The responsible officials of the school or of the police, military of citizen’s army training organization, may impose the appropriate administrative sanctions on the person or persons charged under this provisions even before their conviction.

The maximum penalty herein provided shall be imposed in any of the following instances:
a) When the recruitment is accompanied by force, violence, threat, intimidation or deceit on the person of the recruit who refuses to join;
b) When the recruit, neophyte or applicant initially consents to join but upon learning that hazing will be committed on his person, is prevented from quitting;
c) When the recruit, neophyte or applicant undergone hazing is prevented from reporting he unlawful act to his parents or guardians, to the proper school authorities, or the police authorities, through force, violence, threat or intimidation; or
d) When the hazing is committed outside of the school or institution; or
e) When the victim is below twelve (12) years of age at the time of the hazing.

The owner of the place where hazing is conducted shall be liable as an accomplice, when he has actual knowledge of the hazing conducted therein but failed to take any action to prevent the same from occurring if the hazing is held in the home of one of the officers or members of the fraternity, group, or organization, the parents shall be held liable as principals when they have actual knowledge of the hazing conducted therein but failed to take any action to prevent the same from occurring.

The school authorities including faculty members who consent to the hazing or who have actual knowledge thereof, but failed to take any action to prevent the same from occurring shall be punished as accomplices for the acts of hazing committed by the perpetrators.

The officers, former officers, or alumni of the organization, group, fraternity of sorority who actually planned the hazing although not present when the acts constituting the hazing were committed shall be liable as principals. Officers or members of an organization, group, fraternity or sorority who knowingly cooperated in carrying out the hazing by inducing the victim to be present thereat shall be liable as principals. A fraternity or sorority’s adviser who is present when the acts constituting the hazing were committed and failed to take any action to prevent the same from occurring shall be liable as principals.

The presence of any person during the hazing is prima facie evidence of participation therein as a principal unless he prevented the commission of the acts punishable herein.

Any person charged under this provision shall not be entitled to the mitigating circumstance that there was no intention to commit so grave a wrong.

This section shall apply to the president, manager, director or other responsible officer of a corporation engaged in hazing as a requirement for employment in the manner provided herein.

SEC. 5. If any provision or part of this Act is declared invalid or unconstitutional, the other parts or provisions thereof shall remain valid and effective.

SEC. 6. All laws, orders, rules and regulations which are inconsistent with or contrary to the provisions of this Act are hereby amended or repealed accordingly.

SEC. 7. This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in at least two (2) national newspapers of general circulation. (Published: Malaya, June 30, 1995 and 91 OG 30, Aug. 14, 1995.)

PERSONAL LIABLE:

1. Officers and members of the fraternity, sorority or organization who actually participate in the infliction of physical harm shall be liable as principals – if the person subjected to hazing suffers any physical injury or dies as a result thereof.
2. Owner of the place where the hazing is conducted shall liable as an accomplice – when he has actual knowledge of the hazing conducted in the home of one of the officers or members of the fraternity, sorority or organization, but failed to prevent the same.

• The presence of “any person” (i.e. whether or not member of the fraternity/sorority) during the hazing is prima facie evidence of participation therein as a principal UNLESS he prevented the commission of the prohibited acts.
• The mitigating circumstance that there was no intention to commit so grave a wrong shall not apply. (Sec, 4, par e, R.A. No. 8049.)

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Recovery
The Hazing
FRAT BOYS
Preventing Hazing: How Parents, Teachers, and Coaches Can Stop the Violence, Harassment, and Humiliation
The Campus Corpse
Hazing Meri Sugarman


2 comments: